• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Habs Season Thread: 2024-25 Regular Season

I expect some improvement next year. So much hinges on health.

I expect Slaf and Caufield to improve and Suzuki to be in the point per game range.

Really curious how we handle the back end. WIll Hutson play a full season in AHL, what about Rienbacher? We need to leverage some defense and picks for help up front.

I am not expecting a playoff spot but in the mix for wildcard first 40 with a slow fade to 10-15 overall dsraft pick
 
“… not at the expense of compromising the long term plan…”

That can be weasel worded any number of ways. If they trade for a top 6 player, who is immediately productive for 5+ years, then that trade does not “compromise the long term plan.” It will be expensive, but still long term in perspective.

So I take it they not going the Detroit route. No 30 year olds for a pointless sugar high.
 
Alan C said:
I expect some improvement next year. So much hinges on health.

I expect Slaf and Caufield to improve and Suzuki to be in the point per game range.

Really curious how we handle the back end. WIll Hutson play a full season in AHL, what about Rienbacher? We need to leverage some defense and picks for help up front.

I am not expecting a playoff spot but in the mix for wildcard first 40 with a slow fade to 10-15 overall dsraft pick
Click to expand...

Yeah, if we can convert that -53 goal differential to -15ish and several OTLs to Ws, then we could be in that mushy middle fighting for the wildcard spot.

We really need Dach to play ~ 80 games.
 
lecoqsportif said:
“… not at the expense of compromising the long term plan…”

That can be weasel worded any number of ways. If they trade for a top 6 player, who is immediately productive for 5+ years, then that trade does not “compromise the long term plan.” It will be expensive, but still long term in perspective.

So I take it they not going the Detroit route. No 30 year olds for a pointless sugar high.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Any trade for an established player has to be for one young enough to fit into the timeline HuGo has envisioned. That's why you can make a case for getting a guy like Zegras (23 years old) but can't make any case for acquiring Marchessault (33 years old)
 
Alan C said:
I expect some improvement next year. So much hinges on health.

I expect Slaf and Caufield to improve and Suzuki to be in the point per game range.

Really curious how we handle the back end. WIll Hutson play a full season in AHL, what about Rienbacher? We need to leverage some defense and picks for help up front.

I am not expecting a playoff spot but in the mix for wildcard first 40 with a slow fade to 10-15 overall dsraft pick
Click to expand...
I don't think Hutson will play at all in the AHL (maybe a few games here and there but that's it).
 
lecoqsportif said:
“… not at the expense of compromising the long term plan…”

That can be weasel worded any number of ways. If they trade for a top 6 player, who is immediately productive for 5+ years, then that trade does not “compromise the long term plan.” It will be expensive, but still long term in perspective.

So I take it they not going the Detroit route. No 30 year olds for a pointless sugar high.
Click to expand...
And it absolutely is, since Hughes followed that up by citing the example IF they were to sign a veteran RDman to 3-4 year deal that could create a roadblock for Mailloux, Redenbacher’s progression.

I find it interesting Gorton emphasized a few times how he’s hearing players are more open to signing in Mtl due to MSLs presence…

Would throwing a boat load of $$ at Stamkos on a 2-year deal constitute “compromising long term plan”? Moreso given the F they draft will not be available for likely 1-2 years? Exception of Celebrini ..
 
34 years old… eh. I dunno.

It would have an impact, and two years seems ok. But then what? Cycle through aging superstars on short deals?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top