not that I disagree, but I think they realize they need to not be total dinosaurs on this one. they paraded a bunch of their female MPs out to give favourable soundbites to the CBC about LGBT issues, at least. which is something?Watching Scheer respond to whether he thinks homosexuality is a sin and the CPC not(to date) giving him the boot is a clear message that they aren't really interested in winning in urban ridings.
Watching Scheer respond to whether he thinks homosexuality is a sin and the CPC not(to date) giving him the boot is a clear message that they aren't really interested in winning in urban ridings.
In our electoral system, party leader matters much more than any one candidate. Having a bunch of female MPs say nice things about LGBT issues is nice and all, but it is completely undercut the instant Scheer opens his mouth about that issue.not that I disagree, but I think they realize they need to not be total dinosaurs on this one. they paraded a bunch of their female MPs out to give favourable soundbites to the CBC about LGBT issues, at least. which is something?
I dunno, I'm torn. Scheer is so incompetent I almost want him to stay on as leader as long as possible.
I'm not sure Scheer survives the leadership review in April. not sure the caucus really reflects the will of conservatives across the country so much as the westerners.
I'm not sure Scheer survives the leadership review in April. not sure the caucus really reflects the will of conservatives across the country so much as the westerners.
please keep scheer.
I don't think his western base of support has turned on him yet. I don't know if they see the election as Scheer's fault so much as they see it as Ontario and Quebec chucking middle fingers up at "the west" (*minus BC...they always seem to forget that the populated portions of BC also have no time for their shit)
Is that honestly a thing?
Hardcore CPC-supporting Westerners think Ontario and Quebec are refusing to vote for Scheer/CPC purely to spite "the west"?
Because when it comes to Western Canada, this is me when I enter the ballot box (though this would probably enrage them no less):
View attachment 5127
So great that we got Squirt instead of Scheer.
Thomas Walkom: Canada follows U.S. in condemning Bolivian election
Now, it seems, Canada thinks that like the U.S. it has the right to interfere — selectively — in other people’s business. We don’t tell the Saudis how to run their country. But we’re happy to tell the Bolivians how to run theirs.www.thestar.com
Is that honestly a thing?
Hardcore CPC-supporting Westerners think Ontario and Quebec are refusing to vote for Scheer/CPC purely to spite "the west"?
Because when it comes to Western Canada, this is me when I enter the ballot box (though this would probably enrage them no less):
View attachment 5127
Suck it America.Trump’s Republicans lost a handful of seats in last year’s mid-term elections due to the retaliatory tariffs issued by Canada, China, the EU and Mexico, a new study found. That means Canada’s response played a small role in wrestling control of the House of Representatives to the Democrats last year.
The study measures the effect at a county-level of U.S. tariffs, the global retaliatory tariffs and government subsidies designed to help those hurt by the retaliation. Along with health care outcomes, which was a major policy issue in the election, the study also controls for a variety of other demographic and economic data to untangle the motivation behind the voting patterns.
“These findings suggest that both the trade war and health care policy contributed meaningfully to the 2018 ‘Blue Wave,’ in which Republicans lost a total of 40 House seats,” the paper reads. “Republican candidates lost ground in counties that were adversely affected by retaliatory tariffs, but saw no discernible gains in counties where workers were disproportionately protected by new U.S. tariffs.”