Nope.I thought you'd enjoy being the lone ranger.
I'll rephrase - predominantly centrist with left-wing leanings.Centrist sure, left wing ... lol
I'll rephrase - predominantly centrist with left-wing leanings.
I mean I can think of maybe one person on here who would consider voting conservative this election, and then a whole bunch who would consider any of the three parties on the left. Of course I'm making some assumptions here, but I don't think they're unreasonable.
If the forum's political threads were to be characterized as either left-leaning or right-leaning, I would definitely go with left-leaning.
My original point still stands though. I'm even okay expanding it to more diverse opinions on both sides of the spectrum.
So Justin's liberals have done the following things in office:I look at it this way - with Cons/Repubs you get neocons, with Libs/Dems you get neoliberal. Both are well to the right politically, even if the latter pretend to be 'progressive'. Of course, the current Libs and Dems are increasingly cozying up with neocons.
With establishment parties, it's a very right wing political universe these days.
So Justin's liberals have done the following things in office:
- increase income tax on the wealthiest
- universal child care benefit
- all the mortgage rules to cool the market (stress tests, etc)
- made an effort to bring in, proportionally, a ton of Syrian refugees (vs other countries)
- laughed off the idea of balanced budgets, and likely entered us into a structural deficit (granted, right wingers do this too, but not usually intentionally)
- federal carbon tax
I have a hard time characterizing this government as being 'well to the right'. Chretien or Martin Liberals you can probably make a more convincing argument. But less sure about Justin.
Oh, he absolutely should be.Assange shouldn't be the banner carrier for freedom of the press though.
by what standard?that's valid only if you think the current canadian political parties fall neatly on that spectrum.
the liberals are actually probably a bit right on the political spectrum overall.
The reason a lot of people are not defending him is because he was successfully smeared by the people he exposed. The claim that he worked with the Russians is the latest of those smears.BL do you think that Wikileaks is and has always been totally independent of Russia?
I think that may have a lot to do with why people are not rallying behind Assange