I don't expect the top 3 to hold up obviously with a larger sample, but he leads the team in P/60. Your nephew is 2nd and of course McMann is 3rd. On-ice s% for them are 11, 11 and 10 respectively. Unsustainable maybe, but nothing crazy.Another thing.
When can we admit that Timmins is at minimum a really good 3rd pairing can crusher?
I don't expect the top 3 to hold up obviously with a larger sample, but he leads the team in P/60.
His nerdies have suffered a bit lately but the sample is large enough to be fairly comfortable that he's a very good bottom pair weapon. And he gives them something they don't really have elsewhere beyond Rielly so it's a no brainer to make him a regular (and was the best case scenario on Klingberg ever better than him?). I suspect once Gio comes back the nerdies will continue to be consistently strong.He's 1st in xG & 1st in GF%, the latter will settle down a bit as his PDO drops some (103.4%) but xG is process and good shit happens when he's on the ice. Puck goes the right way, we generate good chances. I don't think I'll ever trust him against heavy use matchups, but I be he can be a good 19-20mpg can crusher #4-5 type.
His nerdies have suffered a bit lately but the sample is large enough to be fairly comfortable that he's a very good bottom pair weapon. And he gives them something they don't really have elsewhere beyond Rielly so it's a no brainer to make him a regular (and was the best case scenario on Klingberg ever better than him?). I suspect once Gio comes back the nerdies will continue to be consistently strong.
View: https://x.com/jonassiegel/status/1734804100905103648?s=46
So if Matthews scores 60 again he’ll be the 2nd player in NHL history to do it not in the 80s-early 90s. And the 1st played with Bobby Orr.
Another thing.
When can we admit that Timmins is at minimum a really good 3rd pairing can crusher?