View: https://x.com/TheFourthPeriod/status/1750315067378130948?s=20
Gudas - ANA - +7
Roy - LA - +7
Skjei - CAR - +7
Durzi - ARI - +5
Gavrikov - LA - +3
Valimaki - ARI - +3
Johnson - Buf - +2
Miller - NJ - +2
Carrier - NAS - 0
Pesce - CAR - -1
Roy and Skjei are UFAs. Carolina has Orlov on the bottom pair, and LA has Clarke. Both teams are middling offensively. Bertuzzi for one of those guys could be interesting.
shit.What is Fowler?
Seems to be the #1 d on Zona, has above water nerdies and excellent relative numbers. Idk what kind of usage he gets or if he's protected at all (zone starts imply he doesn't get treacherous usage but isn't protected either) but he leads the team in icetime and has done quite well with those minutes. He sure looks like a quality top 4 d to me. And maybe a little more ambitious of a target than Klingberg!nah Durzi would not help our problems with our d-corps much I don't think.
would maybe be a Timmins upgrade, but doubt the acquisition cost justifies it.
View: https://x.com/TheFourthPeriod/status/1750315067378130948?s=20
Gudas - ANA - +7
Roy - LA - +7
Skjei - CAR - +7
Durzi - ARI - +5
Gavrikov - LA - +3
Valimaki - ARI - +3
Johnson - Buf - +2
Miller - NJ - +2
Carrier - NAS - 0
Pesce - CAR - -1
Roy and Skjei are UFAs. Carolina has Orlov on the bottom pair, and LA has Clarke. Both teams are middling offensively. Bertuzzi for one of those guys could be interesting.
couldn't he not crack the LAK top-4? and weren't his nerdies with LA terrible?Seems to be the #1 d on Zona, has above water nerdies and excellent relative numbers. Idk what kind of usage he gets or if he's protected at all (zone starts imply he doesn't get treacherous usage but isn't protected either) but he leads the team in icetime and has done quite well with those minutes. He sure looks like a quality top 4 d to me. And maybe a little more ambitious of a target than Klingberg!
couldn't he not crack the LAK top-4? and weren't his nerdies with LA terrible?