• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

zeke said:

View: https://x.com/hugolowell/status/1841563663150289011
Click to expand...

Few pages in. First few pages focused on how Trump discussed with his team in advance of the election that if the expectation was he'd lead early before the mail in votes came in, he would just declare victory while he was ahead.

Then goes through the many instances of him laying the groundwork for a "it will be rigged" argument:

Some examples:

1727898527634.png
 
- they knew the allegations 100k dead people had voted in GA were false, and talked about it privately while saying otherwise publicly
- they knew the allegations in coffee county wee false, talked about it privately while saying otherwise publicly
- ditto the allegations over the video at state farm arena
- ditto the allegations of fraud in AZ - acknowledged having no evidence
 
MindzEye said:
Meant to? No.

Often used for? Yeah.

It comes down to the quality of the individual pollsters. If a pollster has a strong track record of their polls lining up with reality, putting them with other strong pollsters into an aggregate is an excellent way of knowing where the electorate probably is at any given time within a percentage point or two.
Click to expand...

Not sure how candidate internal polling differs so vastly from public.
 
hockeylover said:
- they knew the allegations 100k dead people had voted in GA were false, and talked about it privately while saying otherwise publicly
- they knew the allegations in coffee county wee false, talked about it privately while saying otherwise publicly
- ditto the allegations over the video at state farm arena
- ditto the allegations of fraud in AZ - acknowledged having no evidence
Click to expand...
aka they were full of shit all along, which surprises no one here except maybe flyguy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top