• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

MindzEye said:
I don't think he has an ulterior motive aside from a combo of self promotion and hubris.
Click to expand...
I don’t think he has any motives, but he has the attitude of a lot of you on here.

“Idiots. They just don’t understand models. I’m the expert. They’re just stupid and don’t understand basic statistical modeling.”
 
FlyGuy said:
I didn’t say it was. I said “oh boy dominion voting machine issues again”.
Click to expand...
again, that implies there were previous issues. there's no evidence I'm aware of of any previous issues. unless you're referring to the false claims made on Fox, Newsmax, and OAN?
 
FlyGuy said:
Your question is based on an invalid premise of what I believe.
Click to expand...
my question has nothing to do with your beliefs. I just want to know why a guy who claims to not believe in our trust expertise takes his wife to a OBGYN, instead of a guy named Dave (or Pete, for that matter).

your failure to answer a simple question makes me think you're just full of shit though.
 
Wayward DP said:
my question has nothing to do with your beliefs. I just want to know why a guy who claims to not believe in our trust expertise takes his wife to a OBGYN, instead of a guy named Dave (or Pete, for that matter).

your failure to answer a simple question makes me think you're just full of shit though.
Click to expand...
My wife in that instance picks who she believes has the expertise to consult and advise. She trusts his judgement and has the free will to choose who she listens to. She does not have to take his word at face value though and can get alternate opinions before deciding what she would like to do with her health

Your proposal is that wayward designates the expert because the FI community gave Wayward that power and my wife has to go to that one and do as they say without a choice in the matter
 
FlyGuy said:
This would have altered the election outcome if the public new the contents were real based on research.

Pardon my grammar. At the gym
Click to expand...

You're upset that Hunter Biden's cock was not made public before the election. His cock, some drug use, and owning a gun when he wasn't supposed to turned out to be everything of substance on that laptop.

You're upset that social media websites didn't like how they got gamed in 2016 and put some guard rails and speed bumps in place for 2020 that got tripped by the laptop bullshit.
 
FlyGuy said:
My wife in that instance picks who she believes has the expertise to consult and advise. She trusts his judgement and has the free will to choose who she listens to. She does not have to take his word at face value though and can get alternate opinions before deciding what she would like to do with her health
Click to expand...
wait, so you do believe in expertise?

or you just let your wife overrule you, if you don't?

I am trying to clearly understand your beliefs on expertise and experts.

and to your question, if an OBGYN is the most qualified candidate for President (or Prime Minister), I would vote for them. I don't see any reason a doctor could not run for office. in fact, experience as a doctor would be a huge asset in terms of implementing healthcare policies.

it's actually interesting that you brought it up, because I would argue Kamala is more qualified to be President than Trump. happy to get into that if you disagree (recognizing Trump has done the job before, just alarmingly poorly and lazily).
 
FlyGuy said:
Your proposal is that wayward designates the expert because the FI community gave Wayward that power and my wife has to go to that one and do as they say without a choice in the matter
Click to expand...
I haven't proposed anything?

and doctor's are a self-regulated profession. so I'm gonna fill in the blanks in your sentence with the truth.

FlyGuy said:
Your proposal is that the college of physicians and surgeons designates the expert who can be a doctor because society the FI community gave Wayward the college that power and my wife has to go to that one and do as they say without a choice in the matter
Click to expand...
the bolded is how it literally works right now and you don't seem to have a problem with it? if you can show me where I proposed something different, have at it...
 
FlyGuy said:
This would have altered the election outcome if the public new the contents were real based on research.

Pardon my grammar. At the gym
Click to expand...
what information about the candidate for President, Joe Biden, was suppressed?

again, there's no evidence of kickbacks. Comer and Jordan spent four+ years chasing that, with nothing to show for it.
 
Wayward DP said:
wait, so you do believe in expertise?

or you just let your wife overrule you, if you don't?

I am trying to clearly understand your beliefs on expertise and experts.

and to your question, if an OBGYN is the most qualified candidate for President (or Prime Minister), I would vote for them. I don't see any reason a doctor could not run for office. in fact, experience as a doctor would be a huge asset in terms of implementing healthcare policies.

it's actually interesting that you brought it up, because I would argue Kamala is more qualified to be President than Trump. happy to get into that if you disagree (recognizing Trump has done the job before, just alarmingly poorly and lazily).
Click to expand...
Wayward DP said:
wait, so you do believe in expertise?

or you just let your wife overrule you, if you don't?

I am trying to clearly understand your beliefs on expertise and experts.

and to your question, if an OBGYN is the most qualified candidate for President (or Prime Minister), I would vote for them. I don't see any reason a doctor could not run for office. in fact, experience as a doctor would be a huge asset in terms of implementing healthcare policies.

it's actually interesting that you brought it up, because I would argue Kamala is more qualified to be President than Trump. happy to get into that if you disagree (recognizing Trump has done the job before, just alarmingly poorly and lazily).
Click to expand...
tbh I laid it out enough before and don’t care any to get into it all again.
 
FlyGuy said:
This would have altered the election outcome if the public new the contents were real based on research.

Pardon my grammar. At the gym
Click to expand...
Real question and I am interested in your general opinion:

Do you know anybody who said, "If I knew now what I didn't know then regarding Hunter Biden, I would have voted Trump instead of Joe Biden?"

Or for that matter, do you think there are Joe Biden voters who would have switched their votes to Trump if they knew about what was in the Hunter Biden laptop?

I thought TDS made people vote against Trump, not shady things a candidate's son does or did. It is not like Eric, Jr and Jared are saints either....
 
Wayward DP said:
what information about the candidate for President, Joe Biden, was suppressed?

again, there's no evidence of kickbacks. Comer and Jordan spent four+ years chasing that, with nothing to show for it.
Click to expand...
Agree to disagree. There’s reasonable evidence of the corruption of the Biden family and how Biden was using his political influence to enrich his family via corruption
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top