Only so I can avoid the winnerslol, you pay attention to who wins Grammy’s?
The entertainment industry doesn't reward art, it rewards commerce.you must have a closet full of awards for Worst Take
except the film industry which has historically done the exact oppositeThe entertainment industry doesn't reward art, it rewards commerce.
Now it only rewards the most woke and inaccessible films that no one wants to watch.except the film industry which has historically done the exact opposite
The entertainment industry doesn't reward art, it rewards commerce.
Now it only rewards the most woke and inaccessible films that no one wants to watch.
Apparently it's on Showcase in Canada.Ah sorry. The original movie won a ASCAP Film and Television Music Award. So you can't watch it.
Yeah this is fair, that last scene felt like it went on....forever....and i think at the end of the day i could have done without that guy's weirdo backstory all togetherWeird. Last part felt like they needed to fill up an extra 20 minutes of time they didn’t plan to need. It started off amazing, then got stupid, then got better, then started to get repetitive and drag, but overall entertaining enough for a relatively painless 10 episode commitment.
I don't know why they went down that path. Okay to stretch believability, I mean there was a ton stretched in that season, but then to get into mystical shit? I don't get it. The whole thing with him struck me as trying to sort of copy Javier Bardem's No Country For Old Men character. I actually liked the character in Fargo, but the backstory was totally stupid and entirely unnecessary. I'd have preferred zero backstory so that the mystery would make him even more of a wildcard. I did get two lols out of that last scene though, there were some funny moments, like clinking the bottles, or the kid interrupting him and pushing him aside when he started to talk about his code. But it was a dumb way to end it, I was sitting there thinking like, what is the moral here, what message is this supposed to leave me with, that everybody has some pain in their past and they're not bound to let it guide their destiny? I dunno.Yeah this is fair, that last scene felt like it went on....forever....and i think at the end of the day i could have done without that guy's weirdo backstory all together
I don't know why they went down that path. Okay to stretch believability, I mean there was a ton stretched in that season, but then to get into mystical shit? I don't get it. The whole thing with him struck me as trying to sort of copy Javier Bardem's No Country For Old Men character. I actually liked the character in Fargo, but the backstory was totally stupid and entirely unnecessary. I'd have preferred zero backstory so that the mystery would make him even more of a wildcard. I did get two lols out of that last scene though, there were some funny moments, like clinking the bottles, or the kid interrupting him and pushing him aside when he started to talk about his code. But it was a dumb way to end it, I was sitting there thinking like, what is the moral here, what message is this supposed to leave me with, that everybody has some pain in their past and they're not bound to let it guide their destiny? I dunno.
already read it, wasnt offended, gesture notedEh, I deleted an insulting post that I found comical. You deserved it, but I deleted it. You're welcome.
I swear this isn't what it looks like...i would never, babe.
Fargo is a soap?it is kind of heartwarming to see those two bonding in a seemingly heterosexual way about their favourite soaps