That's the problem though, he's really not and it's not that close. If you want traditional stats, he's 29th in points per game, 51st in rebounding, 38th in assists. That's kind of what he's good at. He can do a bit of everything but he's not really great at anything. Also, everything he does, Scottie already does as good or better and they're really the same position (Scottie is a modern SF/PF being miscast as a SG at the moment imo).
Advanced numbers paint an even grimmer picture of Pascal as a team lead offensive player. 47th in offensive EPM, 44th in offensive BPM. The advanced metrics thinks he's a secondary offensive player.
Neither would I, but this would give us the ability to flip the draft picks to get something as good as Pascal and younger/under contract or potentially better. 3-4 1sts probably gets us into the Lauri Markannen derby this summer and he's way, way better than Pascal and in need of a contract soon.
Ask Chicago. They haven't been able to find anyone remotely interested in taking on Zach Lavine's deal. That's the risk. A small decline, an injury, etc and we're sitting there with a massive albatross on the cap structure through a period of time where Scottie-IQ-RJ are all relatively cheap (the 3 of them take up ~30% of what we're going to spend on salaries next year....take advantage of that shit). I don't see the upside in it tbh. We've seen them together now and it's not contender level. Why throw all that coin at Pascal to be pretty good from 30-33 yrs old?