manny
Well-known member
Seemed to me at the time that the options were trading Teoscar for something useful, or extending him at more than he deserved. Of course just keeping him would have worked out better but I agreed with moving him at the time. Not for a RP with the minimal track record of success, but Atkins is going to Atkins.I'm gonna go with "nah" on that one. Teo likely doesn't have that down season if he's in Toronto last year (his home/away splits were ugly, he just didn't hit well in Seattle at all, but normal Teo on the road) and this year just looks like a normal post breakout Teo year
View attachment 20640
Everything is just back to normal Toronto Teo after one year not hitting in Seattle.
The reason to trade him is that paying him seemed like a bad idea. In retrospect, I don't think that's the case. Especially considering what this front office turned around and used the money on.
In retrospect, it would have been much better to keep Teoscar, sign Kiermaier, and forget about the Varsho trade. They probably would have had 4-5 more wins last year alone and Varsho’s value went way down after last year. Could have had him for a fraction of what they paid.