OT: True Crime

[Montana]

Just watch the film. The kill shot came from the front. It's the one piece of evidence that the conspirators had no control over.

I’m sorry your belief of how physics works based on movies, and how it actually works is different….but reality can’t bend to fit your theory no matter how bad you want it to.

….and again, we have a photo of the back of Kennedy’s head.

They could not have conceived ahead of time that there would be a guy standing in the exact perfect spot with a movie camera at the exact right time to debunk their pre-planned single shooter narrative. They had the Warren Commission Report as much pre-printed before Kennedy even landed in Dallas. And they would have got away with it too, if not for that meddling Zapruder.

Ahhhh so you’re only pretending to be re[dact]ed to troll.

christ, until this line you had me convinced you were actually this dunce.


well played.

 

[zeke]

 

[Montana]

Spoiler: Is the argument that the bullet explodes on contact?

cause if that’s a shot from the front, I don’t know how you explain all that damage from a entry wound…..let alone the projectile spray you can clearly see shooting ~4 feet out from his head.

 

[MindzEye]

So many pages when we all know the cubans did it

 

[Volcanologist]

gross you can see brain chunks

 

[CH1]

checks out...cubans like slowly simmered brain chunks with rice

 

[manny]

Ahhhh so you’re only pretending to be re[dact]ed to troll.

christ, until this line you had me convinced you were actually this dunce.


well played.

This re[dact]ed shit is hella lame.

Get a new insult.

 

[Montana]

hella lame.

new insult.

poor mongoloid manny.

 

[axlsalinger]

gross you can see brain chunks

those are bullets

 

[Montana]

Had never heard of this case before, until I saw a trailer for a doc about it coming to Netflix….since she was a BBC reporter, figured I’d watch the one they made about it, instead of waiting.

wild case.

 

[manny]

poor mongoloid manny.

Glad you got the message. Fool.

 

[Montana]

use the ignore feature….you don’t have to struggle reading my posts, and I don’t need to hear your incessant bleating….moreover no one else need waste their time with these re[dacted] exchanges.

 

[manny]

Lol at “incessant bleating”

You’re clearly trying really hard to be clever with this re[dact]ed garbage, but instead you come off as an insensitive fool. Now you know. You’re welcome.

 

[Montana]

I’ll forever miss your boring banter. later weirdo.

 

[JackBurton]

Had never heard of this case before, until I saw a trailer for a doc about it coming to Netflix….since she was a BBC reporter, figured I’d watch the one they made about it, instead of waiting.

wild case.

I had never heard it either and researched a bit when I saw the trailer. I find many great true crime cases are best outside of North America because they didn't get the exposure here and you can go in cold.

 

[WeHaveMoreCupsThanYou]

I had never heard it either and researched a bit when I saw the trailer. I find many great true crime cases are best outside of North America because they didn't get the exposure here and you can go in cold.

They also tend to be interesting because they're more complex than "Person A pissed off Person B and Person B had unfettered access to firearms so Person A got shot", like you see in too many stories based in the US.

 

[Montana]

Once you’ve seen either this doc or the Netflix on, her former BBC co-host on “Crimewatch” Nick Ross wrote a lengthy essay on the case that makes for a pretty satisfying epilogue….

Spoiler: Who Killed Jill Dando?

Nick Ross

www.nickross.com

 

[CH1]

Nick Ross did it

 

[manny]

I’ll forever miss your boring banter. later weirdo.

Meh. I called out a lame insult. I can be a bit too salty, at times, probably, but I don’t suffer fools. Now you know.

 

[Montana]

since you’re blocked, your last couple posts come up…



move on, find a new slant.