Exactly. It's good that our need at C coincides with the possibility that Wright could turn out to be the best player in the draft. There was never a chance that KK was going to be the 3rd best player in his draft year. Never. That was pure need-based . . . and foolish.Wright may not turn out to be the best in the draft but as long as he's good for us I'm fine.
Brady was the obvious choice at #3.Hughes or Tkachuk would look good in the lineup
People were in denial, and some still areBrady was the obvious choice at #3.
I still am, because the correct choice is pretty easily Quinn Hughes.People were in denial, and some still are
I wanted Hughes and was adverse to Tkachuk. I just didn't see enough upside. I was wrong.I still am, because the correct choice is pretty easily Quinn Hughes.
I was exactly the same. I really didn't want Tkachuk or Zadina. Wanted Hughes but was okay with KK. Guess we were half wrong. Hughes was the right pick... but BT would have been a good pick too.I wanted Hughes and was adverse to Tkachuk. I just didn't see enough upside. I was wrong.
I agree. The commonly-made Tavares comparison is pretty good as I'd say he's been passed in his draft year by Hedman, but he's still a completely valid first overall pick (other than the ditching his team and being despised by the fanbase stuff...)Wright may not turn out to be the best in the draft but as long as he's good for us I'm fine.
They don’t assume that all are subscribers, they assume that some are subscribers.It's so annoying when posters here post links to stories in The Athletic, assuming that we're all subscribers.
The Athletic would have to pay me, not the other way around, to read that super-woke a-hole, Arpon Basu.They don’t assume that all are subscribers, they assume that some are subscribers.
He’s fucking terrible.The Athletic would have to pay me, not the other way around, to read that super-woke a-hole, Arpon Basu.