Stinky
Well-known member
He has also been known to leap tall buildings in a single bound!Slaf has better defensive skills than Wright!?!
He has also been known to leap tall buildings in a single bound!Slaf has better defensive skills than Wright!?!
TldrInteresting read, much closer than I would’ve expected especially in pure skill areas - skating, stickhandling, defensive play, and shooting.
I assumed Wright would be far and away superior
Scouting: Shane Wright or Juraj Slafkovský?
Analyzing and comparing the game of Shane Wright and Juraj Slafkovskýmnahabedian.substack.com
I, too, really wish we had the opportunity to take consensus #1 pick Nail Yakupov over Alex Galchenyuk.Whenever I read all this doubt about Wright and stuff about how Slafkovsky is or should be the real 1OA I remind myself of how thankful I am that Bergevin and Timmins don't get to make this pick.
Galchenyuk, Kotkaniemi, Slafkovsky.
Most of the board at the time wanted Galchenyuk at #3, with few exceptions wanting either Forsberg or Grigorenko.
They both suck.I, too, really wish we had the opportunity to take consensus #1 pick Nail Yakupov over Alex Galchenyuk.
I had more an issue with his development than the pick itself. For KK I had an issue with both.He was the right pick at that time , not a reach
Might of gone 1OA if he didnt blow his knee out
I had more an issue with his development than the pick itself. For KK I had an issue with both.
I think he’s smart but far too cautious and timid.Unfortunately the IQ of a brick
Slafkosky appears to be one from what I read so I would not touch him with the 1OA. When your main attribute is your size and not your talent, I can't see why people think he has a shot at being taken instead of wright.I think he’s smart but far too cautious and timid.
A project should never be taken third overall
Yeah, I wanted AG. I thought he was going to be a stud... I was wrong.Most of the board at the time wanted Galchenyuk at #3, with few exceptions wanting either Forsberg or Grigorenko.
I'm not sure I would call him a project. Looks like he had huge upside, but I feel he also has a lower floor than Wright.Slafkosky appears to be one from what I read so I would not touch him with the 1OA. When your main attribute is your size and not your talent, I can't see why people think he has a shot at being taken instead of wright.
Wright is not going to be Mcdavid but if we get a bergerong/oneil type of center, I'd be OK with this. All I'm reading is he should be better than Suzuki. Some complains about his commitment but that can be corrected, talent can't be tought.
Did Slaf’s team make the playoffs? I’m wondering how many points he put up because it must have been a ton to even consider him over Wright. Anyone know?
Juraj Slafkovský - Stats, Contract, Salary & More
Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Juraj Slafkovský, 2004-03-30 Kosice, SVK Slovakia. Most recently in the NHL with Montréal Canadiens. Complete player biography and stats.www.eliteprospects.com
Why? He’s 18 in a men’s league and apparently didn’t get a lot of prime ice time. Dumb argument.Did Slaf’s team make the playoffs? I’m wondering how many points he put up because it must have been a ton to even consider him over Wright. Anyone know?
He's 6'4 220 lbs. If he was so good that he was worth taking over a guy with Wright's overall body of work... he'd be playing more.Why? He’s 18 in a men’s league and apparently didn’t get a lot of prime ice time. Dumb argument.
If it was believed that Slaf, at 6'4", 220lbs was a can't miss superstar and future HOFer he would be the unquestioned #1 pick and Wright would be the little talked-about door prize for the team that got the 2nd overall pick. It wouldn't be close, not with a physical specimen like that. He would be the next Lindros.He's 6'4 220 lbs. If he was so good that he was worth taking over a guy with Wright's overall body of work... he'd be playing more.
Don't get me wrong, he is probably an excellent player and he'll probably be a heckuva NHL player. I'm just going to need someone to earn more TOI for me to get excited about taking them at #1.