Man going over the numbers for both is complicated. Lots of inconsistencies and variation.
I would tend to conclude that manson is better statistically but at the same time he's had a guy like Lindholm to help which severson has never had, and his one bad year last year came in the year he played mostly apart from him. Meanwhile severson's numbers before this season were more questionable than I thought, though as a 25yr old his steady improvement into a very good year this year kinda makes sense.Manson of course brings size and toughness which is nice, but his offensive contributions are nil. Though even in his bad year last year his defensive metrics stayed good. I could make statistical arguments for both of them being realgud and both of them being huge question marks.
Overall I like both, but man it takes a higher pay grade than mine to sort out the numbers on this comp.