if the medical staff suggests resting murray to start off, there's not really another option for keefe tonight.
I can’t say I’m bothered by the decision to start Kallgren. Even if health wasn’t a concern with Murray, I don’t think you should be starting any goalie in the Babcockian way—where they play every game except for half of a back-to-back.
The Leafs also have four games this week.
The continued scratching and press box banishment of Robertson is pure undiluted idiocy, though. Can’t imagine what Keefe and Dubas are thinking there.
Maybe.... they are showcasing someone else for a trade.I can’t say I’m bothered by the decision to start Kallgren. Even if health wasn’t a concern with Murray, I don’t think you should be starting any goalie in the Babcockian way—where they play every game except for half of a back-to-back.
The Leafs also have four games this week.
The continued scratching and press box banishment of Robertson is pure undiluted idiocy, though. Can’t imagine what Keefe and Dubas are thinking there.
This seems reasonable. Though I don't think sitting Robertson has been undeserved, I think you gotta work him back in there.
Even if he stinks you have to play him. Can’t just let him rot in the press box. It’s not like there are 12 forwards lighting the world on fire anyway.
I've noticed Engvall getting talked up a bit on twitter and he's been in on some scoring plays recently as well. Maybe that's the guy they are trying to move and showcase and they don't want to have Robertson in yet, so that his trade value may be higher... I really need them to get rid of Kerfoot and Engvall in some sort of package to bring in one other forward and then Robertson takes a spot in the top six and the traded player takes third line C...Maybe.... they are showcasing someone else for a trade.
Even if he stinks you have to play him. Can’t just let him rot in the press box. It’s not like there are 12 forwards lighting the world on fire anyway.
The Leafs are in second place in their division.Well the priority is the team and the team has been discombobulated this year and I think Keefe is just feeling the lines starting to finally settle in a bit and probably doesn't want to disrupt anything at the moment. The other issue is that Holmberg has given him a more comforting presence at C than the other options had, meaning that he has to take out a winger for Nick to get in.....with the Kampf line playing well he doesn't want to remove ZAR and Malgin and disrupt it, meaning that on merit you're looking at removing a salaried guy in Kerf/Krok/Engvall which would be a bigger move but tbh i bet he's considering it.