hockeylover
Well-known member
that's actually pretty funny.
In this scenario, if Matt Murray is moved, the Leafs have an additional $7 million to fill out the forward group above. (With Murray in the fold, it’s more like $3 million, and some bargain hunting will have to occur.)
Someone hasn't been paying attentionLOL
"Fact is, Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner, at $11 million apiece, are virtually untradeable"
Holmberg and Kneis on the 4th line and you can still potentially get kampf at ~1.5MMSpeaking of Mirtle
![]()
![]()
Mirtle: Why the Maple Leafs really won the Jake McCabe trade. And what comes next
In McCabe, the Maple Leafs added a top-four blueliner for bottom-pair money for the rest of this season and two more.theathletic.com
This trade puts them in great shape for next year. They'll have money to keep Bunting, ROR and Knies and add an impact forward.
He's went back to his roots after the Foligno and Boosh debacles. This is the kind of creativity I expect and love to see out of him.Great work by Dubas. Even if they lose in the first round. The result just blurs the truth.
It's basically like grabbing an ELC contract that's a top 4 d or top 6 forward for 1.5-2m bucks on 3 playoff runs. I mean in the Leafs case the nearly guaranteed nature of a top 4 d for the next 3 playoffs is obviously easily worth a 1st and a 2nd... they are very unlikely to draft anyone as good as McCabe in those slots and they, as well as Tampa and many other teams, have clearly run the numbers to prove the risk-reward makes it a no-brainer. It's almost common sense really.. these late 1sts have always had bloated value around the league.