Cha Cha Cha ShannyWhy does he want to ditch his current job with unfinished business, leave under the circumstances he left under, to get a chance at reshaping Pittsburgh “in a few years” after they’re done catering to Crosby? What is compelling in any of that?
Already answeredWhat is compelling in any of that?
To debate it further would be to just repeat.Already answered
Get married, have kids.To debate it further would be to just repeat.
Suffice it to say there’s nothing in Pittsburgh that would be more compelling than in Toronto, and nothing would justify him having intentionally done what he did to his name and rep in order to get there.
I don’t get it. The family troubles get solved by moving your family to Pittsburgh, which has a shittier team and nowhere near the resources of the Leafs, and making less money?Get married, have kids.
Nothing compelling. You're a little out of touch on this one mate.
I don’t get it. The family troubles get solved by moving your family to Pittsburgh, which has a shittier team and nowhere near the resources of the Leafs, and making less money?
If that presser was an attempt to gain leverage then holy shit they’ve dodged a bullet and I totally get why we overpaid everybody.nah I think it would be more like this:
- Dubie and Leafs are talking contract, reach some sort of agreement
- Dubie hears from a little birdie that Pitts likes him and would be willing to offer him xxxx amount, which is higher than Toronto
- Dubie talks to his wife, who the fuck knows that they discuss, but it leads to last Monday's press conference
- Dubie tries to gain leverage in Leafs contract talks through presser, fails disastrously
and the rest we mostly know
I'm not saying I subscribe to this theory, but it is plausible to me.
I.e. the thing that changed or moved the needle was Pitts reaching out to Dubie (illegally, I may add) to try and tempt him away. He begins having second thoughts, decides if he's going to stay he should at least earn what he could elsewhere, etc. etc.
If that presser was an attempt to gain leverage then holy shit they’ve dodged a bullet and I totally get why we overpaid everybody.
You've made a lot of assumptions in this post.I don’t get it. The family troubles get solved by moving your family to Pittsburgh, which has a shittier team and nowhere near the resources of the Leafs, and making less money?
I mean you're just picking and choosing the parts of the press conferences you want to believe. If we take them all at face value, then it makes a lot more sense.Why does he want to ditch his current job with unfinished business, leave under the circumstances he left under, to get a chance at reshaping Pittsburgh “in a few years” after they’re done catering to Crosby? What is compelling in any of that?
agreed, for sure. I'm not on the LOF train though that this was all a (spectacularly failed) negotiating ploy by the dubie-man.If that presser was an attempt to gain leverage then holy shit they’ve dodged a bullet and I totally get why we overpaid everybody.
When did you get so smart anyway?-a GM who can't handle the heat built a team that couldn't handle the heat
-a GM who won a poll on easiest touch in a negotiation lost his position due to...mishandling his own contract negotiation
I dunno...in the end, it does kinda track.
But the thing is, even if it turns out we were saved from ourselves here, the guy who loved Dubas barely a week ago and was ready to re-ink him for term is still in charge of the Maple Leafs.
Brad Treliving is a pretty lukewarm option, honestly. That line of speculation makes me want to believe the CJ report that Shanahan called the core 4 and told them they're being kept. Because I'm not sure I trust that guy making huge franchise altering moves or to not give out big crippling term deals to non-superstars(which Dubas did not, unless you want to include Tavares)
That ownership group is interesting I must sayI don’t get it. The family troubles get solved by moving your family to Pittsburgh, which has a shittier team and nowhere near the resources of the Leafs, and making less money?