I saw where Allen "accidentally" elbowed another guy in the face just last week. Something about leopards and spots applies I thinkDid Grayson Allen sign an NHL contract?
I saw where Allen "accidentally" elbowed another guy in the face just last week. Something about leopards and spots applies I thinkDid Grayson Allen sign an NHL contract?
I mean, why not? Zedeno Chara is gonna land in the hall of fame one day and he trotted out the "I'm just so tall" story to justify every one of the 2500 or so cross checks he landed on a guy's face and/or neck.Rempe would be the type to pull that same type of thing but then claim he was simply the bigger man landing on top of a smaller man…glad the NHL for a change decided to take something seriously and dole out a double digit suspension.
That always strikes me as odd. Isn’t the assault victim in this case also an NHLPA member? Seems like the NHLPA should be in charge of suspensions etc. Heck if the players union doesn’t care if players maim each other on the ice why should the league.NHLPA has appealed Hartman’s suspension. No matter, he won’t be playing against the Canes tomorrow. The Wild claimed his childhood friend, Vinnie Hinostroza, off waivers from Nashville to replace him.
This happens in all major NA sports with unions. I can never reconcile it either....your union member did something that could have severely injured or even killed another. Who is representing that injured player when you appeal a suspension? At what point are you doing the rest of the union members a disservice by defending a repeat offender and getting him back on the ice quicker than he should be?That always strikes me as odd. Isn’t the assault victim in this case also an NHLPA member? Seems like the NHLPA should be in charge of suspensions etc. Heck if the players union doesn’t care if players maim each other on the ice why should the league.
To be fair, the player's appeal HAS to come through the PA. It's not like they're endorsing it or anything. It's just a structural thing, really.That always strikes me as odd. Isn’t the assault victim in this case also an NHLPA member? Seems like the NHLPA should be in charge of suspensions etc. Heck if the players union doesn’t care if players maim each other on the ice why should the league.
They can choose not to appeal when a member is suspended for injuring another member. Maybe that will cut down on the douchebaggery from certain players.To be fair, the player's appeal HAS to come through the PA. It's not like they're endorsing it or anything. It's just a structural thing, really.
I mean, I guess they could bail on a request for appeal but once you start drawing that line then you really are picking and choosing which of your association members are fully represented and which aren't. That's not realistic, frankly. I understand why people want to see bad actors punished, but the appeal is built into the process to ensure that cooler heads prevail and that the terms of the CBA are honored. That's not a bad thing. We haven't seen a ton of suspensions reduced ... not for serious stuff anyway. It's all just part of the process that has been collectively bargained.They can choose not to appeal when a member is suspended for injuring another member. Maybe that will cut down on the douchebaggery from certain players.
The last one I remember being reduced was Tom Wilson’s 20 game suspension in 2018 that was reduced to 14 games. There were 29 suspensions last season, 4 were appealed. All were less than 6 games, so Bettman had the final authority, they couldn’t be appealed to an arbitrator. The only suspensions for more than 6 games were Shane Pinto’s 41 game suspension and Valeri Nichushkin’s 26 game suspension. Neither appealed. The 29 suspensions includes Torts being suspended for 2 games and couldn’t be appealed.I mean, I guess they could bail on a request for appeal but once you start drawing that line then you really are picking and choosing which of your association members are fully represented and which aren't. That's not realistic, frankly. I understand why people want to see bad actors punished, but the appeal is built into the process to ensure that cooler heads prevail and that the terms of the CBA are honored. That's not a bad thing. We haven't seen a ton of suspensions reduced ... not for serious stuff anyway. It's all just part of the process that has been collectively bargained.
It seems to me that the players association should be represented on the player safety committee of whatever it is. Then they pass down decisions on punishment as one. It seems silly that the PA can only get involved on behalf of the offender. They ought to be demanding harsher penalties for this kind of BS. Considering there is no cap relief given for suspensions it’s in the ownership’s best interest to keep suspensions short.Which means that the league hasn't been particularly arbitrary and capricious in handing out suspensions and that Hartman will likely either get no relief or a minor reduction. I see no harm in any of that being considered a second time.