LesCanadiens
Active member
PreciselyThat size advantage is gone in the NHL
PreciselyThat size advantage is gone in the NHL
I gave it a LOL because you’re basically asking us to completely disregard multiple professional scouting services, and NHL scouting departments, and just accept your views as being the final word.Well, lol all you want, bro. I have a thick skin. People out there also lol'd when I was emphatic that Wright was way overrated, based on watching him in his D year in Kingston. My picks were Cooley/Slaf. And that Slaf would become a top-line forward. This when he was struggling before December. I base my opinions on watching the players myself. Not over the hype on the internet or anyone's mock draft lists. And there is no disputing the facts I mentioned. They speak for themselves. I'm more than humble enough to admit I was wrong in any situation.
It’s also not accurate.That critique is agenda driven
That was my implication.It’s also not accurate.
I gave it a LOL because you’re basically asking us to completely disregard multiple professional scouting services, and NHL scouting departments, and just accept your views as being the final word.
Why? It's my objective opinion. The only "agenda" I have, is that I want the Habs to make the best pick at #5. I don't have anything against Lindstrom personally. Nor do I have any agenda to favor Catton or others. Just my take. That's all.That critique is agenda driven
He's just stating his opinion, and speaking of which, what do you like about Lindstrom? Without relying on others' opinions from scouting services?I gave it a LOL because you’re basically asking us to completely disregard multiple professional scouting services, and NHL scouting departments, and just accept your views as being the final word.
You're going to have a coronary when I post my personal picks for the top 32, based on my opinion.It’s also not accurate.
I watch a lot due to being forced into early retirement, and having IPTV where I can watch every game from almost any league in the world. I've always followed prospects as a hobby. Been wrong many times, been right many times. 'Cause ultimately, it's a crap-shoot. Thus the Zadina's, Yakupovs or on the other side, the MSL's and Gallaghers etc.that is why I rarely comment on who I want (other than to say it was not the guy we took in case that turns out badly) given I literally have no idea who any of these guys are, don't watch junior hockey etc.
But I think you mentioned one time you wanted Kate Beckinsalethat is why I rarely comment on who I want (other than to say it was not the guy we took in case that turns out badly) given I literally have no idea who any of these guys are, don't watch junior hockey etc.
Honestly I only research the guys slotted around our pick to have an idea of the players available and trying to get excited about our potential prospects.that is why I rarely comment on who I want (other than to say it was not the guy we took in case that turns out badly) given I literally have no idea who any of these guys are, don't watch junior hockey etc.
Who doesn't?But I think you mentioned one time you wanted Kate Beckinsale
My apologies if I am wrong
Ok ButtonopoulosYou're going to have a coronary when I post my personal picks for the top 32, based on my opinion.
You're going to have a coronary when I post my personal picks for the top 32, based on my opinion.
It’s included… DemigodYou conveniently forgot to include the player the Habs will actually draft at 5.
exactly, hottest vampire ever, and she is what makes the movie Pearl Harbor palatable...Who doesn't?
guilty as charged your honourBut I think you mentioned one time you wanted Kate Beckinsale
My apologies if I am wrong
I’m ready.You're going to have a coronary when I post my personal picks for the top 32, based on my opinion.