Yeah I'm only talking what would be good deals. That... That would be a bad deal. And it's not unreasonable to think a team may do that. Hopefully not Toronto.The real problem is it seems like everyone is in on Tanev. The contract probably isn’t 7 *$3 but 4-5 *$4-5 if not worse.
U cant do dat
Marner for Ekblad.
Tanev is 35 next year...He could fall off bad in year 1.
They need 2 d not 1. Tanev is the only potentially elite one that they'll be able to afford if they extend the term a bit (in addition to another guy at 5-6m). That's what it comes down to. Can they get two years out of him at a similar level that he played at least year? That's likely the goal. And if it happens, it's a win for the leafs assuming the AAV is in the 3s.Tanev is 35 next year...He could fall off bad in year 1.