Sal_Butera
Well-known member
Because at a certain point facts become irrelevant. No one is arguing that Bergevin is legally culpable of anything. This is a moral and ethical failure we're talking about. At some point, he found out about it and he did nothing. He said nothing. But that doesn't mean he isn't guilty on a higher level than legally.
Your words:
“Bergevin was complicit in the sexual assault of a player ”
Complicit implies an illegal activity