LeafOfFaith
Well-known member
This fucking GM.
you just seem to generally object to market rates for UFAs. I cannot help you with thatBringing AAV down from what, $10m? Why should a 35 year old who doesn’t provide any offense be able to command $5m with term? I don’t pay through the nose for an old defensive specialist.
No, there are multiple names I’d throw money at. Montour and Skjei are 30. We should not be chasing after old guys about to break and competing to give them big long deals. Pinnacle of stupidity to fill up our cap like that.you just seem to generally object to market rates for UFAs. I cannot help you with that
I think that Mikky deal vancouver just made will take zadorov off the board.It’s going to be Tanev and Zadorov isn’t it?
This is it yeah. They're seeking value. Most of us believe they should prioritize two long-term more sure thing solutions on d but it appears with at least one of d they will acquire, he's chasing a sweet spot of shared risk.Tanev scores high in the shared risk category
Except that we’re taking 95% of the risk in that deal. If the sweet spot is our collective asshole, that would definitely fill it up.This is it yeah. They're seeking value. Most of us believe they should prioritize two long-term more sure thing solutions on d but it appears with at least one of d they will acquire, he's chasing a sweet spot of shared risk.
He was one of the best d in the entire playoffs tbh and would be the best defensive d the Leafs have had maybe throughout this entire core's existence. If you sign him for 5 years at a ~3.5 aav and he provides that same level of play next year, you're getting huge excess value for at least year 1.Except that we’re taking 95% of the risk in that deal. If the sweet spot is our collective asshole, that would definitely fill it up.
Brodie went from amazing to craptastic almost overnight. This isn’t one hour before the trade deadline with everyone off the board. We have half a dozen great options that cost nothing but money. Are we really going to give Tanev $5m when we could give $7m to Montour or Skjei?He was one of the best d in the entire playoffs tbh and would be the best defensive d the Leafs have had maybe throughout this entire core's existence. If you sign him for 5 years at a ~3.5 aav and he provides that same level of play next year, you're getting huge excess value for at least year 1.
But that's assuming he doesn't fall off. He'll be 35 this year so it's a tough ask for him to provide that level of play for much longer.
Term and LTIR is the highest currency you got now. give him a front loaded deal to get the AAV down and then the last two three years you LTIR.Guy is gonna be 35 in a few months. Why would we ever give him a 5 year deal? I don’t think I even want him at all. Brodie just fell off a cliff and died at 34 without notice, so now we’re gonna replace him with a guy older than him?
this does not refute my previous point.No, there are multiple names I’d throw money at. Montour and Skjei are 30. We should not be chasing after old guys about to break and competing to give them big long deals. Pinnacle of stupidity to fill up our cap like that.
I don't even think it's that. I think Tre just loves Tanev.This is it yeah. They're seeking value. Most of us believe they should prioritize two long-term more sure thing solutions on d but it appears with at least one of d they will acquire, he's chasing a sweet spot of shared risk.
not only age, but injury historyAge aside, Tanev is by far the best shutdown "stopper" on the market. But ignoring age here is probably dumb.
35 with lots of miles and injuries that can recurHe was one of the best d in the entire playoffs tbh and would be the best defensive d the Leafs have had maybe throughout this entire core's existence. If you sign him for 5 years at a ~3.5 aav and he provides that same level of play next year, you're getting huge excess value for at least year 1.
But that's assuming he doesn't fall off. He'll be 35 this year so it's a tough ask for him to provide that level of play for much longer.
fwiw I agree that we should be targeting a Skjei or Roy type instead of Tanev.Brodie went from amazing to craptastic almost overnight. This isn’t one hour before the trade deadline with everyone off the board. We have half a dozen great options that cost nothing but money. Are we really going to give Tanev $5m when we could give $7m to Montour or Skjei?
I'd rather have Skjei + Roy than Skjei + Tanev or Roy + Tanev.in addition to.
in addition to.