not sure why people think the players are extra motivated by a tournament being in the olympics or not.
One of the greatest international hockey moments in history was from a 2 team exhibition series.
Yes, because in terms of hockey, the Olympics and anything else that isnt the NHL and the Stanley Cup is bullshit. Canada doesn't need to win a gold medal for every Canadian to know in their hearts and in their bones that we are the best hockey nation on earth. It just is.Canada might be the only hockey nation whose top olympic moments aren't their top hockey legacy moments.
Yes. The rest of the world was watching the Munich Olympics tragedy.Canadian history.
Olympics are for amateur athletes. Professionals should have their own world cups, like soccer does.
But as a fan, I just enjoy seeing high level, competitive elite sports. The name of the tournament adds nothing for me.
Canada doesn't need to win a gold medal for every Canadian to know in their hearts and in their bones that we are the best hockey nation on earth. It just is.
What most people liked about 1972 was that they could root for their country without having to root against their favorite NHL team's best players. Back then the NHL was almost 100% Canadian and absolutely 0% Russian. But today, while you may be Canadian, your favorite player from your favorite NHL club might not be. It changes the intensity of your fandom.One of the greatest international hockey moments in history was from a 2 team exhibition series.
Most people like elite hockey and rooting for their country.
Precisely, Presto alias.Olympics are for amateur athletes. Professionals should have their own world cups, like soccer does.
But as a fan, I just enjoy seeing high level, competitive elite sports. The name of the tournament adds nothing for me.
When Hasek and the Czechs won gold, they were technically the best hockey nation on earth. But did anyone, even the Czechs themselves, actually believe that? Of course not. No one did, just like no one believed that the US was the best when they won the gold in 1980.But this isn't how being the best at anything actually works. If you can't prove it, you're not the best, you're just a narcissistic jerk off.
We're not the best because we think we are. We're the best because the 5 times the best in the world showed up to find out who was the best, we won 3 of the 5. That's how being the best actually works.
So (assuming you are Canadian) will you be happy or sad if Matthews hoists the 4 Nations Cup above his head on behalf of the victorious Team USA after vanquishing Team Canada in the final?TLDR: Nothing matters, everything sucks, and besides the sun is going to explode in 5 billion years anyways so you're a loser for caring about anything really
I mean, maybe you old guys feel that way or something. I’m perfectly capable of cheering against Matthews while he’s playing for the USA and then cheering for him when he plays for the Leafs. Just because it’s some giant cognitive leap for you doesn’t mean it is for everyone else, so maybe drop the “we” and “your”.What most people liked about 1972 was that they could root for their country without having to root against their favorite NHL team's best players. Back then the NHL was almost 100% Canadian and absolutely 0% Russian. But today, while you may be Canadian, your favorite player from your favorite NHL club might not be. It changes the intensity of your fandom.
In 1972 the entire country could openly root for Canada and openly despise the Soviets. But years later during the 1987 Canada Cup when Canada, with only one Habs player, Claude Lemieux, and a bunch of Nordiques, Oilers, Flyers and Islanders players that Habs fans despise faced off against Sweden at the Montreal Forum, the loudest cheers during the player introductions were for Mats Naslund. Our allegiance to our NHL team supercedes the national team. We care more about Stanley Cups than Canada Cups or 4 Nations Cups or Challenge Cups or Olympic gold medals and we always will.