So you don't actually care about the judgement of the presidential candidate, is what you're saying.
"judgement" lol. She married a guy who cheated on his wife 15 years ago with the nanny. The abuse seems to be an anonymous ex girlfriend claiming he slapped her one time in 2012 and he denies it.
So, even if we assume the worst and Doug did both, and we're talking about the "judgement" of the candidates, we're left to choose between two candidates:
One of whom married a guy who cheated on his wife 15 years ago, and slapped a girlfriend 12 years ago.
The other of whom who:
- Has been found guilty of sexual assault
- Overall has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least 26 different women
- Cheated on his pregnant wife with a porn star and roughly around the same time a playboy bunny.
- According to a sworn deposition, raped his 1st wife and she provides pretty significant detail in the deposition. She later walked it back after the divorce was finalized but oddly the very litigious Donald Trump didn't see fit to sue her over that. It's almost as if a guy addicted to making people sign NDA's added that as a requirement to her divorce settlement or something.
- Close personal friends with Jeff Epstein (I mean, if we're talking about judgement here....)
- Used to walk in on teenage girls in their dressing room
Most of the acts long, long pre date his time in politics, so miss me with the "political smear" bullshit. Ivana made her claim in 1990, Jill Harth in 1992, etc
lol, but we're supposed to be worried about shit the 2nd Doug did in 2009?