Now multiply by turnout %It doesn't. At least not according to current registration.
Just for example in the very important PA race, as of the 21st
View attachment 22496
3,791,607 Democrats registered
3,673,783 Republicans registered
Haha I am someone who has a bad habit of indulging in distractions at work.Who did this board piss off?
You read this thread in big chunks and it's blatantly obvious that flyguy is just a pissed off ex-poster...he only posts for effect, that's kind of a dead giveaway.
carry on...
This thread gives you the impression there is room for opposing ideas and discourse?So yeah, I started thinking about this in general...posting for effect.
People that only post to get a reaction as opposed to discourse...that is, imo, how you can separate thinkers from shitheads.
Now multiply by turnout %
This thread gives you the impression there is room for opposing ideas and discourse?
Seeing that the wall is hollow....don’t you guys feel like you’re beating your head against a wall here?
I still find it humuorous.Respectfully, suck my dick. I take the time to relatively politely provide evidence for every point I make. You acknowledge basically non of the evidence that is contrary to your worldview and plow onward with weird maga talking point after talking point, never actually discussing any of them and you're talking about who is and isn't open to discourse?
Actually, I take back the respectfully part, just suck my dick.
Are the fries up yet? The drive through is backed up.Haha I am someone who has a bad habit of indulging in distractions at work.
You cite from sources that support your POV, label them the experts, and claim any opposing thoughts are not supported by experts and are biased sources. Finding ways to discredit anything posted by attacking the source. And your sources are infallible because they support what you say, thus are the experts, thus they have no bias. It's too enormous of a task to point out that what you read in media and don't instead live here in the US are two completely different realities. Operation Mockingbird is alive and well is transparent to most of us on the right.Respectfully, suck my dick. I take the time to relatively politely provide evidence for every point I make. You acknowledge basically non of the evidence that is contrary to your worldview and plow onward with weird maga talking point after talking point, never actually discussing any of them and you're talking about who is and isn't open to discourse?
Actually, I take back the respectfully part, just suck my dick.
There is more to discourse than posting "lol" or a laughing emoji.This thread gives you the impression there is room for opposing ideas and discourse?
You cite from sources that support your POV, label them the experts, and claim any opposing thoughts are not supported by experts and are biased sources. Finding ways to discredit anything posted by attacking the source. And your sources are infallible because they support what you say, thus are the experts, thus they have no bias. It's too enormous of a task to point out that what you read in media and don't instead live here in the US are two completely different realities. Operation Mockingbird is alive and well is transparent to most of us on the right.
Look, it's sad you have the time to go to the depths you do in replies. I respect it in a way. I don't have that time nor care, though, so I do partake in some fun here and don't take anything personal, usually, and don't make anything personal to you all.
So, to the insults, all I have to say is "bless your heart."
I like to keep things light. This thread can be not good for the soul at times.There is more to discourse than posting "lol" or a laughing emoji.
There is more to discourse than posting "lol" or a laughing emoji.