And in a head to head unscripted battle of wits, she mopped the floor with Trump in the debate. Yeah... I agree that she wasn't a good candidate and I agree with a lot of the points being made about the dems flaws and the reasons for their demise. But it's hard for me to ignore the woman thing, especially with society's (especially with young males) recent push to excessive masculinity.Serious question though...what kind of resume are we expecting a female Presidential candidate to have for her to not be a bad candidate?
Because from where I sit, both Kamala and Hillary had better resumes that Trump, Obama, Bush II, & Clinton before they become President. Hillary was deemed to serious, Kamala too silly. There doesn't appear to be an ideal personality type for a female candidate to have either. Why can't we just admit the obvious?
Maybe because you just think it’s obvious.Thats the primary difference between liberals and conservatives…..conservatives want policies that allow them to hold on to everything they’ve got, and pull the ladder up behind them. While Dems often
Serious question though...what kind of resume are we expecting a female Presidential candidate to have for her to not be a bad candidate?
Because from where I sit, both Kamala and Hillary had better resumes that Trump, Obama, Bush II, & Clinton before they become President. Hillary was deemed to serious, Kamala too silly. There doesn't appear to be an ideal personality type for a female candidate to have either. Why can't we just admit the obvious.
You can be as right about Trump as you want. But you're wrong about the US. You can bet against it, if you like. Not sure the world cares.You do you.
You'll find out soon enough that we were right about Trump.
But if I were you I'd be packing my shit and moving back to Canada. Or moving to Mexico. Or moving to literally anywhere else.
Maybe because you just think it’s obvious.
It fits your narrative that conservatives are mean and bad and apparently misogynistic and liberals are good. So maybe just comfort yourself with that.
I was optimistic that Kamala would go 6-1 in the swing states (like Joe), winning each one by a slim 0.5 to 1.5% margin.
Instead she went 0 for 7. By slim margins. No shock there.
The ground game didn’t make up for the fact that she could not articulate solutions to pressing problems like food prices and immigration. In fact, she was seen as part of the problem.
Trumps solutions are cartoonish (drill baby drill for inflation, round them up and build a wall for immigration) but they are something
This is the problem with the modern liberal - if you disagree with them on any level, you're torn down and they call you names and hit you with accusations of racism, misogyny, bigotry, stupidity, elitism, lack of sympathy, and so on. That's a big reason for this dem loss imo - this sort of thing made people want to go out there and bring about some change.
Serious question though...what kind of resume are we expecting a female Presidential candidate to have for her to not be a bad candidate?
Because from where I sit, both Kamala and Hillary had better resumes that Trump, Obama, Bush II, & Clinton before they become President. Hillary was deemed to serious, Kamala too silly. There doesn't appear to be an ideal personality type for a female candidate to have either. Why can't we just admit the obvious?
Yeah Hillary was probably the most qualified candidate since like, I dunno….Nixon?
Being qualified is now a bug, tho.
Better to be an outsider with a few snappy slogans and empty promises
I agree with this. But then let's stop talking about "good" and "bad" candidates on Monday morning like it's anything more than a fucked up 6 month long reality TV show anymore.
Kamala got voted off of the island in the season finale.