When Chapman ultimatlely signs for like 3/60 im going to be furious its not with the Jays, absolutely furious.
Just like when Edwin turned down there 4 year 80 million dollar offer and the management panicked.
Edwin ended up signing a 3 year 60 million dollar deal.
NoBut what if I advance a bunch of weird argument stating that IKF is just as good?
Will that make you feel better?
Does it involve saying that slumpy chapman and ikf are the same thing, and chapman was only good in April so it doesnt matter? Then do you show me a potato, ask me to think about it? then bash me in the head with the potato until i agree with you?But what if I advance a bunch of weird argument stating that IKF is just as good?
Will that make you feel better?
I doubt it costs that much.Give the Bellinger deal to Chapman.
my personal favourite is how we constantly hear about Shatkins being too sweet spot of shared risk to spend money ... but the only reason they make the playoffs every year is that they spend so much money.I came here for the meltdown, and it wasn't a great meltdown, you guys have done better!
Is Chapman's 2 months worth 15 mil more per year? Sounds like a good strategy.
I am waiting until the Trade Deadline when the same people who said the Jays have no prospects to compete for MLB spots will then say that Shatkins should not care about prospects because they don't end up doing much and go for it. That should be fun!
Is Chapman's 2 months worth 15 mil more per year?
I am waiting until the Trade Deadline when the same people who said the Jays have no prospects to compete for MLB spots will then say that Shatkins should not care about prospects because they don't end up doing much and go for it. That should be fun!
damn, forgot about them. 2/100m, 99m deferred for 50 yearsDodgers for sure