• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

The Mother-fucking goddamn Off-season Thread

Seems fair.

Ultimately, Keefe should probably go though.
And he probably will. But shanahan by all accounts (despite the latest reports) has been a pretty hands off president. So him not firing Keefe and letting the new GM decide is pretty consistent with that notion. I'm sure everyone including Keefe knows the most likely outcome, but shanny has little reason to rush it.
 
Firing Keefe is proper hygiene— new GM gets to decide next coach without the old coach whimpering in the trunk

This almost never happens.

Habs didnt fire ducharme before hiring Hughes.

You guys are now advocating the leafs to operate abnormally.
 
Shanahan fires Keefe and a new media circus begins.

"He's a control freak." "Will the new GM even have any autonomy if he can't even decide on Keefe?" "He's not as hands off as he lets on" etc.

There's no winning really. Just do what the other teams do. Let the GM decide. Shanny will provide his input on Keefe, they will collaborate and are likely to fire him. But the GM should be part of the process. That's how it works.
 
This almost never happens.

Habs didnt fire ducharme before hiring Hughes.

You guys are now advocating the leafs to operate abnormally.

I think not firing DD was the anomaly for the Habs
 
Ok?

Is that supposed to be an argument in favour of hanging on to Keefe?

There's two arguments.

1. Coaching decisions are up to the GM.
2. Keefe is a good coach.

Either way, criticizing shanny for not firing him is weird.
 
Except its not. Rarely do teams "clear house" and fire the GM and Coach simultaneously.

Perhaps google what I said---the Habs tend to clean house

Savard/Demers in '95
Houle/Vigneault in 2000
Gauthier/interim coach in 2012
 
Back
Top