Rolex
Canadiens Moderator
Sooooo.... what have the Rangers done recently that makes you want to follow the same path as them?
They are good at trading players on decline for players still decent
Sooooo.... what have the Rangers done recently that makes you want to follow the same path as them?
They are good at trading players on decline for players still decent
Gaborik for Nash....
Nash picked it up after returning from his injury....
Can you give me an example for the Habs since the Gorges-Rivet trade ?
Ummm... they didn't trade Gaborik for Nash.
The Rangers gave up Brandon Dubinsky, Artem Anisimov, Tim Erixon and a 1st round pick for Nash.
The money they saved on Gaborik is used to pay Nash....it's obvious Nash replaces Gaborik....both make almost the same salary I believe.
It's like when Sather dumped Gomez to get Gaborik.....but both weren't traded one for the other
I'd rather have Dubinsky than Nash.
:shocked:
I know that....
When Rangers got Nash, it was obvious Gaborik's days were numbered....most media guys predicted Rangers would try and trade him
I believe the train of thought is replacing Gaborik with Nash in their lineup. The means being irrelevant.
I don't believe you did. They were 2 separate trades that took place almost a season apart.
I believe the train of thought is replacing Gaborik with Nash in their lineup. The means being irrelevant.